Share |

Intellectual Property

Overview

Intellectual property (IP) law developed over time to protect different forms of intangible subject matter. The concept is not new: Jewish law early on prohibited plagiarism, calling it "g'neivat da'at," or stealing the mind. The earliest use of the term "intellectual property" was in an 1845 Massachusetts Circuit Court ruling in a patent case.

The term intellectual property did not come into common usage in the United States until December 1980, when Congress enacted the Bayh-Dole Act or Patent and Trademark Law Amendments Act, 35 U.S.C. § 200-212. The Act gave U.S. universities, non-profits and small businesses control over their inventions resulting from federal government-funded research. Since then, the protections afforded intellectual property have expanded exponentially.

Featured CasesSubscribe

  • PA Advisors, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

    Plaintiff PA Advisors, LLC allege that Defendants infringed no U.S. Patent No. 6,199,067 entitled "System and Method for Generating Personalized User Profiles and for Utilizing the Generated User Profiles to Perform Adaptive Internet Searches."
    Texas Eastern District Court
    Patent
    Filed: November 2, 2007
    Plaintiff: PA Advisors, LLC, PA Advisors, LLC, PA Advisors, LLC, PA Advisors, LLC, PA Advisors, LLC and others... Defendant: Google Inc., Google Inc., Google Inc., Yahoo! Inc., Yahoo! Inc. and others...
    Last Docket Filed: February 9, 2010
  • Aloft Media, LLC v. Oracle Corporation et al

    Texas Eastern District Court
    Plaintiff
    Filed: July 14, 2009
    Plaintiff: Aloft Media, LLC Defendant: Oracle Corporation, Oracle USA, Inc., Yahoo! Inc., Google, Inc., Fair Isaac Corp. and others...
    Last Docket Filed: February 5, 2010
  • The Author's Guild et al v. Google Inc.

    Plaintiffs The Author's Guide. Herbert Mitgang, Betty Miles and Daniel Hoffman sued Google Inc. for reproducing a digital copy of plaintiffs' works without the copyright holders' permission and in violation of the authors' rights under the copyright laws.
    New York Southern District Court
    Copyright
    Filed: September 20, 2005
    Plaintiff: The Author's Guild, The Author's Guild, The Author's Guild, The Author's Guild, The Author's Guild and others... Defendant: Google Inc., Google Inc., Google Inc., Google Inc., Google Inc.
    Last Docket Filed: February 5, 2010
  • Marvel Worldwide, Inc. et al v. Kirby et al

    New York Southern District Court
    None
    Filed: January 8, 2010
    Plaintiff: Marvel Worldwide, Inc., Marvel Worldwide, Inc., Marvel Worldwide, Inc., Marvel Worldwide, Inc., Marvel Worldwide, Inc. and others... Defendant: Lisa R. Kirby, Barbara J. Kirby, Neal L. Kirby, Susan N. Kirby
    Last Docket Filed: February 5, 2010
  • Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al

    Plaintiff Perfect 10 sued defendant Google Inc. for displaying thumbnails of photographs copyrighted by the plaintiff. Consolidated with Perfect 10 Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc. et al. Additional Resources Ninth Circuit Opinion in Perfect 10 v. Google and Amazon.
    California Central District Court
    Copyright
    Filed: November 19, 2004
    Plaintiff: Perfect 10 Inc; Defendant: Google Inc, DoesCounter Claimant: Google Inc, Counter Defendant: Perfect 10 Inc
    Last Docket Filed: February 4, 2010

DocketsSubscribe

  • Pfizer Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc.

    Delaware District Court
    Patent
    Filed: February 9, 2010
    Plaintiff: Pfizer Inc., Pfizer pharmaceuticals, llc, Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Limited, C.p. pharmaceuticals international c.v. Defendant: Sandoz Inc. Counter Defendant: Warner-Lambert Company, Warner-Lambert Company LLC, Pfizer Inc., Pfizer pharmaceuticals, llc, Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Limited, C.p. pharmaceuticals international c.v. and others...
  • Sandoz Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc. et al

    Delaware District Court
    Patent
    Filed: February 9, 2010
    Plaintiff: Sandoz Inc. Defendant: Pfizer, Inc., Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals, C.p. pharmaceuticals international c.v., Warner-Lambert Company, Warner-Lambert Company LLC
  • WOLFF et al v. KAHN et al

    Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
    Copyrights
    Filed: February 9, 2010
    Plaintiff: BRIAN R. WOLFF, INTERNATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, INC. Defendant: ALFRED KAHN, BRAINWORKS DESIGN GROUP, INC.

LegislationSubscribe

RegulationsSubscribe

  • Rule - Mandatory Deposit of Published Electronic Works Available Only Online

    Copyright Office, Library of Congress
    Rule
    Mandatory Deposit of Published Electronic Works Available Only Online
    ,
    3863-3870 [2010-1202]
    LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Copyright Office 37 CFR Part 202 [Docket No. RM 2009-3] Mandatory Deposit of Published Electronic Works Available Only Online AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress. ACTION: Interim Rule. SUMMARY: The Copyright Office of the Library of Congress is adopting an interim regulation governing mandatory deposit of electronic works published in the United States and available only online. The regulation establishes that online-only works are exempt from mandatory deposit... [read document]
    View Document | Download PDF
  • Proposed Rule - Rules of Practice before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Ex ...

    Patent and Trademark Office
    Proposed Rule
    Rules of Practice before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Ex Parte Appeals
    ,
    67987-68004 [E9-30402]
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office 37 CFR Part 41 [Docket No.: PTO-P-2009-0021] RIN 0651-AC37 Rules of Practice Before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Ex Parte Appeals; Request for Comments on Potential Modifications to Final Rule and Notice of Roundtable During Comment Period AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce. ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rule making; request for comments. SUMMARY: The United States Patent and... [read document]
    View Document | Download PDF
  • Rule - Exemption to Prohibition on Circumvention of Copyright Protection Systems for Access ...

    Copyright Office, Library of Congress
    Rule
    Exemption to Prohibition on Circumvention of Copyright Protection Systems for Access Control Technologies
    ,
    55138-55139 [E9-25850]
    LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Copyright Office 37 CFR Part 201 [Docket No. RM 2008-08] Exemption to Prohibition on Circumvention of Copyright Protection Systems for Access Control Technologies AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress. ACTION: Interim rule. SUMMARY: The Librarian of Congress is extending, on an interim basis, the existing classes of works with respect to which the prohibition against circumvention of technological measures that effectively control access to copyrighted works shall... [read document]
    View Document | Download PDF
  • Rule - Changes in Requirements for Signature of Documents, Recognition of Representatives, etc.

    Patent and Trademark Office
    Rule
    Changes in Requirements for Signature of Documents, Recognition of Representatives, etc.
    ,
    54898-54912 [E9-25460]
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office 37 CFR Parts 2 and 11 [Docket No. PTO-T-2008-0021] RIN 0651-AC26 Changes in Requirements for Signature of Documents, Recognition of Representatives, and Establishing and Changing the Correspondence Address in Trademark Cases AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce. ACTION: Final rule . SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (``Office'') is revising the Trademark Rules of Practice to set forth... [read document]
    View Document | Download PDF
  • Rule - Changes to Practice for Continued Examination Filings, Patent Applications Containing ...

    Patent and Trademark Office
    Rule
    Changes to Practice for Continued Examination Filings, Patent Applications Containing Patentably Indistinct Claims, etc.
    ,
    52686-52691 [E9-24667]
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Patent and Trademark Office 37 CFR Part 1 [Docket No.: PTO-P-2009-0049] RIN 0651-AC36 Changes to Practice for Continued Examination Filings, Patent Applications Containing Patentably Indistinct Claims, and Examination of Claims in Patent Applications AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (Office) published a final rule in the Federal Register in August of 2007 to revise the... [read document]
    View Document | Download PDF

ArticlesSubscribe