CALCRIM No. 1100. Sexual Penetration With Person Under 14
Judicial Council of California Criminal Jury Instructions (2017 edition)Download PDF
(iv) Sexual Penetration
1100.Sexual Penetration With Person Under 14 (Pen. Code,
The defendant is charged [in Count ] with sexual penetration
with a person who was under the age of 14 and at least 10 years
younger than the defendant [in violation of Penal Code section 289(j)].
To prove that the defendant is guilty of this crime, the People must
1. The defendant participated in an act of sexual penetration with
2. The penetration was accomplished by using (a/an) (foreign
object[,]/ [or] substance[,]/ [or] instrument[,]/ [or] device[,]/ [or]
3. At the time of the act, the other person was under the age of 14
years and was at least 10 years younger than the defendant.
Sexual penetration means (penetration, however slight, of the genital or
anal openings of another person/ [or] causing another person to
penetrate, however slightly, the defendant’s or someone else’s genital or
anal opening/ [or] causing the other person to penetrate, no matter how
slightly, his or her own genital or anal opening) for the purpose of
sexual abuse, arousal, or gratiﬁcation.
[A foreign object, substance, instrument, or device includes any part of
the body except a sexual organ.] [An unknown object includes any
foreign object, substance, instrument, or device, or any part of the body,
including a penis, if it is not known what object penetrated the
[Penetration for sexual abuse means penetration for the purpose of
causing pain, injury, or discomfort.]
[It is not a defense that the other person may have consented to the
[Under the law, a person becomes one year older as soon as the ﬁrst
minute of his or her birthday has begun.]
New January 2006
The court has a sua sponte duty to give an instruction deﬁning the elements of the
Give the bracketed paragraph that begins with “It is not a defense that” on request,
if there is evidence that the minor consented to the act. (See People v. Kemp (1934)
139 Cal.App. 48, 51 [34 P.2d 502].)
Give the bracketed paragraph about calculating age if requested. (Fam. Code,
§ 6500; In re Harris (1993) 5 Cal.4th 813, 849–850 [21 Cal.Rptr.2d 373, 855 P.2d
• Elements. Pen. Code, § 289(j).
•Foreign Object, Substance, Instrument, or Device Deﬁned. Pen. Code,
§ 289(k)(2); People v. Wilcox (1986) 177 Cal.App.3d 715, 717 [223 Cal.Rptr.
170] [a ﬁnger is a “foreign object”].
• Sexual Penetration Deﬁned. Pen. Code, § 289(k)(1); see People v. Quintana
(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 1362, 1371 [108 Cal.Rptr.2d 235] [penetration of genital
opening refers to penetration of labia majora, not the vagina].
• Unknown Object Deﬁned. Pen. Code, § 289(k)(3).
• Minor’s Consent Not a Defense. See People v. Kemp (1934) 139 Cal.App. 48,
51 [34 P.2d 502] [in context of statutory rape].
• Sexual Abuse Deﬁned. People v. White (1986) 179 Cal.App.3d 193, 205–206
[224 Cal.Rptr. 467].
2 Witkin & Epstein, California Criminal Law (3d ed. 2000) Sex Offenses and
Crimes Against Decency, §§ 47, 48.
6 Millman, Sevilla & Tarlow, California Criminal Defense Practice, Ch. 142,
Crimes Against the Person, § 142.20[d], [b] (Matthew Bender).
Couzens & Bigelow, Sex Crimes: California Law and Procedure §§ 12:16, 12:17
(The Rutter Group).
LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSES
• Attempted Sexual Penetration With Minor Under 14. Pen. Code, §§ 664,
•Sexual Penetration With Minor Under 18. See People v. Culbertson (1985)
171 Cal.App.3d 508, 516 [217 Cal.Rptr. 347]; People v. Jerome (1984) 160
Cal.App.3d 1087, 1097–1098 [207 Cal.Rptr. 199] [both in context of oral
copulation with minor under 14].
SEX OFFENSES CALCRIM No. 1100
Mistake of Fact Defense Not Available
In People v. Olsen (1984) 36 Cal.3d 638, 649 [205 Cal.Rptr. 492, 685 P.2d 52], the
court held that the defendant’s mistaken belief that the victim was over 14 was no
defense to a charge of lewd and lascivious acts with a child under 14.
CALCRIM No. 1100 SEX OFFENSES
© Judicial Council of California.