CALCRIM No. 1192. Testimony on Rape Trauma Syndrome

Judicial Council of California Criminal Jury Instructions (2022 edition)

Download PDF
1192.Testimony on Rape Trauma Syndrome
You have heard testimony from <insert name of expert>
regarding rape trauma syndrome.
s <insert name of expert> testimony about rape trauma
syndrome is not evidence that the defendant committed any of the
crimes charged against (him/her) [or any conduct or crime[s] with which
(he/she) was not charged].
You may consider this evidence only in deciding whether or not
s <insert name of alleged rape victim> conduct was not
inconsistent with the conduct of someone who has been raped, and in
evaluating the believability of her testimony.
New January 2006; Revised April 2020
Instructional Duty
The court has a sua sponte duty to give this instruction if an expert testifies on rape
trauma syndrome. (See People v. Housley (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 947, 958-959 [8
Cal.Rptr.2d 431] [sua sponte duty in context of child sexual abuse accommodation
syndrome (CSAAS)]; CJER Mandatory Criminal Jury Instructions Handbook (CJER
2019) Sua Sponte Instructions, § 2.163; but see People v. Sanchez (1989) 208
Cal.App.3d 721, 736 [256 Cal.Rptr. 446] [instruction on CSAAS only required on
Related Instructions
If this instruction is given, also give CALCRIM No. 303, Limited Purpose Evidence
in General, and CALCRIM No. 332, Expert Witness Testimony.
Rebut Inference That Victim’s Conduct Inconsistent With Claim of
Rape. People v. Bledsoe (1984) 36 Cal.3d 236, 247-248 [203 Cal.Rptr. 450,
681 P.2d 291].
Syndrome Evidence Not Admissible to Prove Rape Occurred. People v.
Bledsoe (1984) 36 Cal.3d 236, 251 [203 Cal.Rptr. 450, 681 P.2d 291].
It is unnecessary and potentially misleading to instruct that the expert testimony
assumes that a rape has in fact occurred. (See People v. Gilbert (1992) 5
Cal.App.4th 1372, 1387 [7 Cal.Rptr.2d 660] [in context of child molestation].)
1 Witkin, California Evidence (5th ed. 2012) Opinion Evidence, § 53.
Copyright Judicial Council of California
3 Millman, Sevilla & Tarlow, California Criminal Defense Practice, Ch. 71,
Scientific and Expert Evidence, § 71.04[1][d][v][B] (Matthew Bender).
6 Millman, Sevilla & Tarlow, California Criminal Defense Practice, Ch. 142, Crimes
Against the Person, § 142.23[3][d] (Matthew Bender).
Couzens & Bigelow, Sex Crimes: California Law and Procedure § 12:7 (The Rutter
Copyright Judicial Council of California

© Judicial Council of California.