Justia
search
My Account
Log In Sign Up
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Research the Law
  • Law Schools
  • Laws & Regs
  • Newsletters
  • Marketing Solutions
    • Justia Connect
    • Pro Membership
    • Basic Membership
    • Justia Lawyer Directory
    • Platinum Placements
    • Gold Placements
    • Justia Elevate
    • SEO
    • Websites
    • Blogs
    • Justia Amplify
    • PPC Management
    • Google Business Profile
    • Social Media
    • Justia Onward Blog
Justia Criminal Law California Criminal Jury Instructions (CALCRIM) (2023) Post-Trial: Introductory

Post-Trial: Introductory

Series 200 - Post-Trial: Introductory

A. Introductory Instructions and Admonitions

  • 200. Duties of Judge and Jury
  • 201. Do Not Investigate
  • 202. Note-Taking and Reading Back of Testimony
  • 203. Multiple Defendants
  • 204. Defendant Physically Restrained
  • 205. Charge Removed From Jury Consideration
  • 206. One or More Defendants Removed From Case
  • 207. Proof Need Not Show Actual Date
  • 208. Witness Identified as John or Jane Doe
  • 209-218. Reserved for Future Use

B. General Legal Concepts

  • 219. Reasonable Doubt in Civil Commitment Proceedings
  • 220. Reasonable Doubt
  • 221. Reasonable Doubt: Bifurcated Trial
  • 222. Evidence
  • 223. Direct and Circumstantial Evidence: Defined
  • 224. Circumstantial Evidence: Sufficiency of Evidence
  • 225. Circumstantial Evidence: Intent or Mental State
  • 226. Witnesses
  • 227-239. Reserved for Future Use

C. Causation

  • 240. Causation
  • 241-249. Reserved for Future Use

D. Union of Act and Intent

  • 250. Union of Act and Intent: General Intent
  • 251. Union of Act and Intent: Specific Intent or Mental State
  • 252. Union of Act and Intent: General and Specific Intent Together
  • 253. Union of Act and Intent: Criminal Negligence
  • 254. Union of Act and Intent: Strict-Liability Crime
  • 255-299. Reserved for Future Use

© Judicial Council of California.

Page last reviewed May 2023

Today on Verdict

Partisan Gerrymandering Case Under the New Mexico Constitution Nears Critical Point

Vikram David Amar

UC Davis Law professor Vikram David Amar discusses the ongoing legal battle over congressional redistricting in New Mexico, where Republicans have filed a lawsuit claiming that new district maps favor Democrats and violate the state constitution.

Find a Lawyer

Lawyers - Get Listed Now! Get a free directory profile listing

Ask a Lawyer

Question:
Add details
120
More Information:
1000
Justia Legal Resources
Find a Lawyer Arrow
  • Bankruptcy Lawyers
  • Business Lawyers
  • Criminal Lawyers
  • Employment Lawyers
  • Estate Planning Lawyers
  • Family Lawyers
  • Personal Injury Lawyers
  • More...
Individuals Arrow
  • Bankruptcy
  • Criminal
  • Divorce
  • DUI
  • Estate Planning
  • Family Law
  • Personal Injury
  • More...
Business Arrow
  • Business Formation
  • Business Operations
  • Employment
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Trade
  • Real Estate
  • Tax Law
  • More...
Law Students Arrow
  • Law Schools
  • Admissions
  • Financial Aid
  • Course Outlines
  • Law Journals
  • Blogs
  • Employment
  • More...
US Federal Law Arrow
  • US Constitution
  • US Code
  • Regulations
  • Supreme Court
  • Circuit Courts
  • District Courts
  • Dockets & Filings
  • More...
US State Law Arrow
  • State Constitutions
  • State Codes
  • State Case Law
  • California
  • Florida
  • New York
  • Texas
  • More...
Other Databases Arrow
  • COVID-19 Resources
  • Legal Blogs
  • Business Forms
  • Product Recalls
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Countries
  • More...
Marketing Solutions Arrow
  • Justia Connect Membership
  • Justia Lawyer Directory
  • Justia Premium Placements
  • Justia Elevate (SEO, Websites)
  • Justia Amplify (PPC, GBP)
  • Justia Onward Blog
  • Testimonials
  • More...
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube Justia © 2023 Justia Justia Connect Legal Portal Company Help Terms of Service Privacy Policy Marketing Solutions