CALCRIM No. 3413. Collective or Cooperative Cultivation Defense (Health & Saf. Code, § 11362.775)

Judicial Council of California Criminal Jury Instructions (2020 edition)

Download PDF
3413.Collective or Cooperative Cultivation Defense (Health & Saf.
Code, § 11362.775)
(Planting[,] [or]/ cultivating[,] [or]/ harvesting[,] [or]/ drying[,] [or]/
processing) cannabis is lawful if authorized by the Medical Marijuana
Program Act. The Medical Marijuana Program Act allows qualified
patients [and their designated primary caregivers] to associate within the
State of California to collectively or cooperatively cultivate cannabis for
medical purposes, for the benefit of its members, but not for profit.
In deciding whether a collective meets these legal requirements, consider
the following factors:
1. The size of the collective’s membership;
2. The volume of purchases from the collective;
3. The level of members’ participation in the operation and
governance of the collective;
4. Whether the collective was formally established as a nonprofit
organization;
5. Presence or absence of financial records;
6. Accountability of the collective to its members;
7. Evidence of profit or loss.
There is no limit on the number of persons who may be members of a
collective.
Every member of the collective does not need to actively participate in
the cultivation process. It is enough if a member provides financial
support by purchasing cannabis from the collective.
Aqualified patient is someone for whom a physician has previously
recommended or approved the use of cannabis for medical purposes.
Collectively means involving united action or cooperative effort of all
members of a group.
Cooperatively means working together or using joint effort toward a
common end.
Cultivate means to foster the growth of a plant.
[A primary caregiver is someone who has consistently assumed
responsibility for the housing, health, or safety of a patient who may
legally possess or cultivate cannabis.]
The People have the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that
951
the defendant was not authorized to (plant[,] [or]/ cultivate[,] [or]/
harvest[,] [or]/ dry[,] [or]/ process) cannabis for medical purposes. If the
People have not met this burden, you must find the defendant not guilty
of this crime.
New February 2015; Revised August 2015, September 2018, March 2019
BENCH NOTES
Instructional Duty
A collective or cooperative cultivation defense under the Medical Marijuana
Program Act may be raised to certain cannabis charges. (See Health & Saf. Code,
§ 11362.775.) The burden is on the defendant to produce sufficient evidence to raise
a reasonable doubt that possession was lawful. (People v. Jackson (2012) 210
Cal.App.4th 525, 529-531, 538-539 [148 Cal.Rptr.3d 375].)
A local ordinance prohibiting cannabis dispensaries does not nullify a defense under
the Medical Marijuana Program Act or the Compassionate Use Act. (People v.
Ahmed (2018) 25 Cal.App.5th 136, 142-143 [235 Cal.Rptr.3d 472]).
AUTHORITY
• Elements. Health & Saf. Code, § 11362.775.
• Factors To Consider. People v. Jackson (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 525 [148
Cal.Rptr.3d 375].
• Primary Caregiver. People v. Mentch (2008) 45 Cal.4th 274, 282-292 [85
Cal.Rptr.3d 480, 195 P.3d 1061]; People v. Mitchell (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th
1189, 1205-1206 [170 Cal.Rptr.3d 825].
• Defendant’s Burden of Proof on Medical Marijuana Program Act Defense.
People v. Jackson (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 525, 529-531, 538-539 [148
Cal.Rptr.3d 375].
• All Members Need Not Participate in Cultivation. People v. Anderson (2015)
232 Cal.App.4th 1259 [182 Cal.Rptr.3d 276].
SECONDARY SOURCES
7 Witkin & Epstein, California Criminal Law (4th ed. 2012) Crimes Against Public
Peace and Welfare, § 147.
6 Millman, Sevilla & Tarlow, California Criminal Defense Practice, Ch. 145,
Narcotics and Alcohol Offenses, § 145.01 (Matthew Bender).
CALCRIM No. 3413 DEFENSES AND INSANITY
952

© Judicial Council of California.