California Criminal Jury Instructions (CALCRIM) (2017)

643. Deliberations and Completion of Verdict Forms: For Use When Defendant Is Charged With Second Degree Murder and Jury Is Given Only One Not Guilty Verdict Form for Each Count; Not to Be Used When Both Voluntary and Involuntary Manslaughter Are Lesser Included Offenses

Download PDF
643.Deliberations and Completion of Verdict Forms: For Use
When Defendant Is Charged With Second Degree Murder and
Jury Is Given Only One Not Guilty Verdict Form for Each Count;
Not to Be Used When Both Voluntary and Involuntary
Manslaughter Are Lesser Included Offenses
[For each count charging second degree murder,] (Y/y)ou (have been/
will be) given verdict forms for guilty of second degree murder, guilty of
(voluntary /involuntary) manslaughter and not guilty.
You may consider these different kinds of homicide in whatever order
you wish, but I can accept a verdict of guilty of (voluntary/involuntary)
manslaughter only if all of you have found the defendant not guilty of
second degree murder.
[As with all the charges in this case,] (To/to) return a verdict of guilty
or not guilty on a count, you must all agree on that decision.
Follow these directions before you give me any completed and signed,
final verdict form. You will complete and sign only one verdict form
[per count]. [Return the unused verdict forms to me, unsigned.]
1. If all of you agree that the People have proved beyond a
reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of second degree
murder, complete and sign that verdict form. Do not complete or
sign any other verdict forms [for that count].
2. If all of you cannot agree whether the defendant is guilty of
second degree murder,inform me only that you cannot reach an
agreement and do not complete or sign any verdict forms [for
that count].
3. If all of you agree that the defendant is not guilty of second
degree murder, but also agree that the defendant is guilty of
(voluntary/involuntary) manslaughter, complete and sign the
form for guilty of (voluntary/involuntary) manslaughter. Do not
complete or sign any other verdict forms [for that count].
4. If all of you agree that the defendant is not guilty of second
degree murder and cannot agree whether the defendant is guilty
of (voluntary/involuntary) manslaughter, inform me that you
cannot reach agreement [on that count]. Do not complete or sign
any other verdict forms [for that count].
5. If all of you agree that the defendant is not guilty of second
degree murder and not guilty of (voluntary/involuntary)
manslaughter, complete and sign the verdict form for not guilty.
Do not complete or sign any other verdict forms [for that count].
406
0200
5. <If the jury is instructed on both voluntary and involuntary
manslaughter as lesser included offenses, this instruction may not be
used. The court must give the jury guilty and not guilty verdict forms
as to second degree murder and each form of manslaughter, and
must instruct pursuant to CALCRIM 642.>
New August 2009
BENCH NOTES
Instructional Duty
In all homicide cases in which the greatest offense charged is second degree
murder and one or more lesser offense is submitted to the jury, the court has a sua
sponte duty to give this instruction or CALCRIM No. 642, Deliberations and
Completion of Verdict Forms: For Use When Defendant Is Charged With Second
Degree Murder and Jury Is Given Not Guilty Forms for Each Level of Homicide.
(See People v. Avalos (1984) 37 Cal.3d 216, 228 [207 Cal.Rptr. 549, 689 P.2d 121]
[must instruct jury that it must be unanimous as to degree of murder]; People v.
Dixon (1979) 24 Cal.3d 43, 52 [154 Cal.Rptr. 236, 592 P.2d 752] [jury must
determine degree]; People v. Breverman (1998) 19 Cal.4th 142, 162 [77 Cal.Rptr.2d
870, 960 P.2d 1094] [duty to instruct on lesser included offenses]; People v.
Dewberry (1959) 51 Cal.2d 548, 555–557 [334 P.2d 852] [duty to instruct that if
jury has reasonable doubt of greater offense must acquit of that charge]; People v.
Fields (1996) 13 Cal.4th 289, 309–310 [52 Cal.Rptr.2d 282, 914 P.2d 832] [duty to
instruct that jury cannot convict of a lesser offense unless it has concluded that
defendant is not guilty of the greater offense]; Stone v. Superior Court (1982) 31
Cal.3d 503, 519 [183 Cal.Rptr. 647, 646 P.2d 809] [duty to give jury opportunity to
render a verdict of partial acquittal on a greater offense], clarified in People v.
Marshall (1996) 13 Cal.4th 799, 826 [55 Cal.Rptr.2d 347, 919 P.2d 1280] [no duty
to inquire about partial acquittal in absence of indication jury may have found
defendant not guilty of greater offense].)
In Stone v. Superior Court, supra, 31 Cal.3d at p. 519, the Supreme Court
suggested that the trial court provide the jury with verdict forms of guilty/not guilty
on each of the charged and lesser offenses. The court later referred to this “as a
judicially declared rule of criminal procedure.” (People v. Kurtzman (1988) 46
Cal.3d 322, 329 [250 Cal.Rptr. 244, 758 P.2d 572].) However, this is not a
mandatory procedure. (Ibid.) If the court chooses not to follow the procedure
suggested in Stone, the court may give this instruction. If the jury later declares
that it is unable to reach a verdict on a lesser offense, then the court must provide
the jury an opportunity to acquit on the greater offense. (People v. Marshall, supra,
13 Cal.4th at p. 826; Stone v. Superior Court, supra, 31 Cal.3d at p. 519.) In such
cases, the court must give CALCRIM No. 642 and must provide the jury with
verdict forms of guilty/not guilty for each offense. (People v. Marshall, supra, 13
Cal.4th at p. 826; Stone v. Superior Court, supra, 31 Cal.3d at p. 519.)
HOMICIDE CALCRIM No. 643
407
0201
The court should tell the jury it may not return a guilty verdict on a lesser included
offense unless it has found the defendant not guilty of the greater offense. (People
v. Fields, supra, 13 Cal.4th at pp. 310–311.) If the jury announces that it is
deadlocked on the greater offense but, despite the court’s instructions, has returned
a guilty verdict on the lesser included offense, the court should again instruct the
jury that it may not convict of the lesser included offense unless it has found the
defendant not guilty of the greater offense. (Ibid.) The court should direct the jury
to reconsider the “lone verdict of conviction of the lesser included offense” in light
of this instruction. (Ibid.; Pen. Code, § 1161.) If the jury is deadlocked on the
greater offense but the court nevertheless records a guilty verdict on the lesser
included offense and then discharges the jury, retrial on the greater offense will be
barred. (People v. Fields, supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 307; Pen. Code, § 1023.)
If, after following the procedures required by Fields, the jury declares that it is
deadlocked on the greater offense, then the prosecution must elect one of the
following options: (1) the prosecutor may request that the court declare a mistrial
on the greater offense without recording the verdict on the lesser offense, allowing
the prosecutor to re-try the defendant for the greater offense; or (2) the prosecutor
may ask the court to record the verdict on the lesser offense and to dismiss the
greater offense, opting to accept the current conviction rather than re-try the
defendant on the greater offense. (People v. Fields, supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 311.)
The court may not control the sequence in which the jury considers the various
homicide offenses. (People v. Kurtzman, supra, 46 Cal.3d at pp. 322, 330.)
AUTHORITY
• Lesser Included Offenses-Duty to Instruct. Pen. Code, § 1159; People v.
Breverman (1998) 19 Cal.4th 142, 162 [77 Cal.Rptr.2d 870, 960 P.2d 1094].
• Degree to Be Set by Jury. Pen. Code, § 1157; People v. Avalos (1984) 37
Cal.3d 216, 228 [207 Cal.Rptr. 549, 689 P.2d 121]; People v. Dixon (1979) 24
Cal.3d 43, 52 [154 Cal.Rptr. 236, 592 P.2d 752].
• Reasonable Doubt as to Degree. Pen. Code, § 1097; People v. Morse (1964)
60 Cal.2d 631, 657 [36 Cal.Rptr. 201, 388 P.2d 33]; People v. Dewberry (1959)
51 Cal.2d 548, 555–557 [334 P.2d 852].
• Conviction of Lesser Precludes Re-trial on Greater. Pen. Code, § 1023; People
v. Fields (1996) 13 Cal.4th 289, 309–310 [52 Cal.Rptr.2d 282, 914 P.2d 832];
People v. Kurtzman (1988) 46 Cal.3d 322, 329 [250 Cal.Rptr. 244, 758 P.2d
572].
• Court May Ask Jury to Reconsider Conviction on Lesser Absent Finding on
Greater. Pen. Code, § 1161; People v. Fields (1996) 13 Cal.4th 289, 310 [52
Cal.Rptr.2d 282, 914 P.2d 832].
• Must Permit Partial Verdict of Acquittal on Greater. People v. Marshall (1996)
13 Cal.4th 799, 826 [55 Cal.Rptr.2d 347, 919 P.2d 1280]; Stone v. Superior
Court (1982) 31 Cal.3d 503, 519 [183 Cal.Rptr. 647, 646 P.2d 809].
• Involuntary Manslaughter Not a Lesser Included Offense of Voluntary
CALCRIM No. 643 HOMICIDE
408
0202
Manslaughter. People v. Orr (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 780, 784–785 [27
Cal.Rptr.2d 553].
Secondary Sources
5 Witkin & Epstein, California Criminal Law (3d ed. 2000) Criminal Trial, § 631.
4Millman, Sevilla & Tarlow, California Criminal Defense Practice, Ch. 85,
Submission to Jury and Verdict, § 85.20 (Matthew Bender).
6 Millman, Sevilla & Tarlow, California Criminal Defense Practice, Ch. 142,
Crimes Against the Person, §§ 142.01[3][e], 142.02[3][c] (Matthew Bender).
644–699. Reserved for Future Use
HOMICIDE CALCRIM No. 643
409
0203