California Criminal Jury Instructions (CALCRIM) (2017)

702. Special Circumstances: Intent Requirement for Accomplice After June 5, 1990 - Other Than Felony Murder

Download PDF
702.Special Circumstances: Intent Requirement for Accomplice
After June 5, 1990—Other Than Felony Murder (Pen. Code,
§ 190.2(c))
If you decide that (the/a) defendant is guilty of first degree murder but
was not the actual killer, then, when you consider the special
circumstance[s] of <insert only special circumstance[s] under
Pen. Code, §§ 190.2(a)(2), (3), (4), (5) or (6)>, you must also decide
whether the defendant acted with the intent to kill.
In order to prove (this/these) special circumstance[s] for a defendant
who is not the actual killer but who is guilty of first degree murder as
(an aider and abettor/ [or] a member of a conspiracy), the People must
prove that the defendant acted with the intent to kill.
[The People do not have to prove that the actual killer acted with the
intent to kill in order for (this/these) special circumstance[s] to be true.
[If you decide that the defendant is guilty of first degree murder, but
you cannot agree whether the defendant was the actual killer, then, in
order to find (this/these) special circumstance[s] true, you must find that
the defendant acted with the intent to kill.]]
If the defendant was not the actual killer, then the People have the
burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that (he/she) acted with
the intent to kill for the special circumstance[s] <insert
only special circumstance[s] under Pen. Code, §§ 190.2(a)(2), (3), (4), (5)
or (6)> to be true. If the People have not met this burden, you must
find (this/these) special circumstance[s] (has/have) not been proved true
[for that defendant].
New January 2006
BENCH NOTES
Instructional Duty
The court has a sua sponte duty to instruct the jury on the mental state required
for accomplice liability when a special circumstance is charged and there is
sufficient evidence to support the finding that the defendant was not the actual
killer. (See People v. Jones (2003) 30 Cal.4th 1084, 1117 [135 Cal.Rptr.2d 370].) If
there is sufficient evidence to show that the defendant may have been an
accomplice and not the actual killer, the court has a sua sponte duty to give the
accomplice intent instruction, regardless of the prosecution’s theory of the case.
(Ibid.)
Proposition 115 modified the intent requirement of the special circumstance law,
codifying the decisions of People v. Anderson (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1104, 1147 [240
416
0210
Cal.Rptr. 585, 742 P.2d 1306], and Tison v. Arizona (1987) 481 U.S. 137, 157–158
[107 S.Ct. 1676, 95 L.Ed.2d 127]. The current law provides that the actual killer
does not have to act with intent to kill unless the special circumstance specifically
requires intent. (Pen. Code, § 190.2(b).) A defendant who is not the actual killer
must act with intent to kill unless the felony-murder special circumstance is
charged. (Pen. Code, §§ 190.2(c), (d).) If the felony-murder special circumstance is
charged, then the People must prove that a defendant who was not the actual killer
either acted with intent to kill or was a major participant and acted with reckless
indifference to human life. (Pen. Code, § 190.2(d); People v. Estrada (1995) 11
Cal.4th 568, 571 [46 Cal.Rptr.2d 586, 904 P.2d 1197].)
Use this instruction for any case in which the jury could conclude that the
defendant was an accomplice to a homicide that occurred after June 5, 1990, and
the defendant is charged with a special circumstance, other than felony murder, that
does not require intent to kill by the actual killer. Currently, the only special
circumstances, other than felony murder, that do not require intent to kill by the
actual killer are: Prior conviction for murder (§ 190.2(a)(2)); Multiple offenses of
murder (§ 190.2(a)(3)); Murder by hidden explosive (§ 190.2(a)(4)); Murder to
avoid arrest (§ 190.2(a)(5)); and Murder by mail bomb (§ 190.2(a)(6)). However,
the court should carefully review the prior versions of Penal Code section 190.2 to
determine if the special circumstance required intent to kill at the time of the
killing because the special circumstances have been amended by referendum
several times.
For those special circumstances where intent to kill is required for both the actual
killer and the accomplice, this instruction is not required. For those special
circumstances, the instruction on the special circumstance states “the defendant
intended to kill” as an element.
When the felony-murder special circumstance is charged, use CALCRIM No. 703,
Special Circumstances: Intent Requirement for Accomplice After June 5,
1990—Felony Murder.
Give the bracketed paragraph stating that the People do not have to prove intent to
kill on the part of the actual killer if there is a codefendant alleged to be the actual
killer or if the jury could convict the defendant as either the actual killer or an
accomplice.
If the jury could convict the defendant either as a principal or as an accomplice,
and the defendant is charged with one of the special circumstances that does not
require intent to kill by the principal, then the jury must find intent to kill if they
cannot agree that the defendant was the actual killer. (People v. Jones (2003) 30
Cal.4th 1084, 1117 [135 Cal.Rptr.2d 370, 70 P.3d 359].) In such cases, the court
should then give both bracketed paragraphs.
HOMICIDE CALCRIM No. 702
417
0211
Do not give this instruction if accomplice liability is not at issue in the case.
Related Instructions
CALCRIM No. 701, Special Circumstances: Intent Requirement for Accomplice
Before June 6, 1990.
CALCRIM No. 703, Special Circumstances: Intent Requirement for Accomplice
After June 5, 1990—Felony Murder.
AUTHORITY
• Accomplice Intent Requirement. Pen. Code, § 190.2(c).
Constitutional Standard for Intent by Accomplice. Tison v. Arizona (1987)
481 U.S. 137, 157–158 [107 S.Ct. 1676, 95 L.Ed.2d 127].
Secondary Sources
3 Witkin & Epstein, California. Criminal Law (3d ed. 2000) Punishment, §§ 453,
460.
4Millman, Sevilla & Tarlow, California Criminal Defense Practice, Ch. 87, Death
Penalty, § 87.14 (Matthew Bender).
CALCRIM No. 702 HOMICIDE
418
0212