California Criminal Jury Instructions (CALCRIM) (2017)

810. Torture

Download PDF
B. TORTURE
810.Torture (Pen. Code, § 206)
The defendant is charged [in Count ] with torture [in violation of
Penal Code section 206].
To prove that the defendant is guilty of this crime, the People must
prove that:
1. The defendant inflicted great bodily injury on someone else;
AND
2. When inflicting the injury, the defendant intended to cause cruel
or extreme pain and suffering for the purpose of revenge,
extortion, persuasion, or for any sadistic purpose.
Great bodily injury means significant or substantial physical injury. It is
an injury that is greater than minor or moderate harm.
[It is not required that a victim actually suffer pain.]
[Someone acts for the purpose of extortion if he or she intends to (1)
obtain a person’s property with the person’s consent and (2) obtain the
person’s consent through the use of force or fear.]
[Someone acts for the purpose of extortion if he or she (1) intends to get
a public official to do an official act and (2) uses force or fear to make
the official do the act. An official act is an act that an officer does in his
or her official capacity using the authority of his or her public office.]
[Someone acts with a sadistic purpose if he or she intends to inflict pain
on someone else in order to experience pleasure himself or herself.]
New January 2006
BENCH NOTES
Instructional Duty
The court has a sua sponte duty to give an instruction defining the elements of the
crime.
Unlike murder by torture, the crime of torture does not require that the intent to
cause pain be premeditated or that any cruel or extreme pain be prolonged. (People
v. Pre (2004) 117 Cal.App.4th 413, 419–420 [11 Cal.Rptr.3d 739]; People v.
Aguilar (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1196, 1204–1205 [68 Cal.Rptr.2d 619]; People v.
Vital (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 441, 444 [52 Cal.Rptr.2d 676].) Torture as defined in
section 206 of the Penal Code focuses on the mental state of the perpetrator and
523
0011
not the actual pain inflicted. (People v. Hale (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 94, 108 [88
Cal.Rptr.2d 904].) Give the first bracketed paragraph on request if there is no proof
that the alleged victim actually suffered pain. (See Pen. Code, § 206.)
“Extortion” need not be defined for purposes of torture. (People v. Barrera (1993)
14 Cal.App.4th 1555, 1564 [18 Cal.Rptr.2d 395]; but see People v. Hill (1983) 141
Cal.App.3d 661, 668 [190 Cal.Rptr. 628] [term should be defined for kidnapping
under Pen. Code, § 209].) Nevertheless, either of the bracketed definitions of
extortion, and the related definition of “official act,” may be given on request if any
of these issues are raised in the case. (See Pen. Code, § 518 [defining “extortion”];
People v. Norris (1985) 40 Cal.3d 51, 55–56 [219 Cal.Rptr. 7, 706 P.2d 1141]
[defining “official act”].) Extortion may also be committed by using “the color of
official right” to make an official do an act. (Pen. Code, § 518; see Evans v. United
States (1992) 504 U.S. 255, 258 [112 S.Ct. 1881, 119 L.Ed.2d 57]; McCormick v.
United States (1990) 500 U.S. 257, 273 [111 S.Ct. 1807, 114 L.Ed.2d 307] [both
discussing common law definition of the term].) It appears that this type of
extortion would rarely occur in the context of torture, so it is excluded from this
instruction.
“Sadistic purpose” may be defined on request. (See People v. Barrera, supra, 14
Cal.App.4th at p. 1564; People v. Raley (1992) 2 Cal.4th 870, 899–901 [8
Cal.Rptr.2d 678, 830 P.2d 712] [approving use of phrase in torture-murder and
special circumstances torture-murder instructions].)
Related Instructions
First degree murder by torture defines torture differently for the purposes of
murder. See CALCRIM No. 521, Murder: Degrees.
AUTHORITY
• Elements. Pen. Code, § 206.
Extortion Defined. Pen. Code, § 518.
• Great Bodily Injury Defined. Pen. Code, § 12022.7(f); see, e.g., People v. Hale
(1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 94, 108 [88 Cal.Rptr.2d 904] [broken and smashed teeth,
split lip, and facial cut sufficient evidence of great bodily injury].
• Cruel Pain Equivalent to Extreme or Severe Pain. People v. Aguilar (1997) 58
Cal.App.4th 1196, 1202 [68 Cal.Rptr.2d 619].
• Intent. People v. Pre (2004) 117 Cal.App.4th 413, 419–420 [11 Cal.Rptr.3d
739]; People v. Hale (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 94, 106–107 [88 Cal.Rptr.2d 904];
People v. Jung (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 1036, 1042–1043 [84 Cal.Rptr.2d 5]; see
People v. Aguilar (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1196, 1204–1206 [68 Cal.Rptr.2d 619]
[neither premeditation nor intent to inflict prolonged pain are elements of
torture].
• Sadistic Purpose Defined. People v. Raley (1992) 2 Cal.4th 870, 899–901 [8
Cal.Rptr.2d 678, 830 P.2d 712]; People v. Aguilar (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1196,
1202–1204 [68 Cal.Rptr.2d 619]; see People v. Healy (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th
CALCRIM No. 810 ASSAULTIVE AND BATTERY CRIMES
524
0012
1137, 1142 [18 Cal.Rptr.2d 274] [sexual element not required].
Secondary Sources
1 Witkin & Epstein, California Criminal Law (3d ed. 2000) Crimes Against the
Person, §§ 88–90.
6 Millman, Sevilla & Tarlow, California Criminal Defense Practice, Ch. 142,
Crimes Against the Person, § 142.15 (Matthew Bender).
LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSES
In People v. Martinez (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 1035, 1042–1046 [23 Cal.Rptr.3d
508], the court held that none of the following offenses were lesser included
offenses to torture: assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245(a)(1)); corporal
injury on a cohabitant (Pen. Code, § 273.5); forcible rape (Pen. Code, § 261(a)(2));
forcible oral copulation (Pen. Code, § 288a(c)); criminal threats (Pen. Code, § 422);
dissuading a witness by force or threats (Pen. Code, § 136.1(c)(1)); false
imprisonment by violence. (Pen. Code, § 236.)
The court did not decide whether assault with force likely to cause great bodily
injury is a lesser included offense to torture. (Id. at p. 1043–1044.)
811–819. Reserved for Future Use
ASSAULTIVE AND BATTERY CRIMES CALCRIM No. 810
525
0013