CACI No. VF-1406. False Arrest With Warrant - Peace Officer - Affirmative Defense - “Good-Faith” Exception
Judicial Council of California Civil Jury Instructions (2023 edition)
Download PDF
VF-1406.False Arrest With Warrant - Peace Officer - Affirmative
Defense - “Good-Faith” Exception
We answer the questions submitted to us as follows:
1. Did [name of defendant] arrest [name of plaintiff]?
1. Yes No
1. If your answer to question 1 is yes, then answer question 2. If you
answered no, stop here, answer no further questions, and have
the presiding juror sign and date this form.
2. [Insert question regarding facts supporting the invalidity of the
warrant or the unlawfulness of the arrest, e.g., “Had the warrant for
[name of plaintiff]’s arrest expired?”]
2. Yes No
2. If your answer to question 2 is yes, then answer question 3. If you
answered no, stop here, answer no further questions, and have
the presiding juror sign and date this form.
3. Would the arrest warrant have appeared valid to a reasonably
intelligent and informed person?
3. Yes No
3. If your answer to question 3 is yes, then answer question 4. If you
answered no, skip questions 4 and 5 and answer question 6.
4. Did [name of defendant] believe the warrant was valid?
4. Yes No
4. If your answer to question 4 is yes, then answer question 5. If you
answered no, skip question 5 and answer question 6.
5. Did [name of defendant] have a reasonable belief that [name of
plaintiff] was the person referred to in the warrant?
5. Yes No
5. If your answer to question 5 is no, then answer question 6. If you
answered yes, stop here, answer no further questions, and have
the presiding juror sign and date this form.
6. Was [name of defendant]’s conduct a substantial factor in causing
harm to [name of plaintiff]?
6. Yes No
6. If your answer to question 6 is yes, then answer question 7. If you
915
answered no, stop here, answer no further questions, and have
the presiding juror sign and date this form.
7. What are [name of plaintiff]’s damages?
[a. Past economic loss
[lost earnings $ ]
[lost profits $ ]
[medical expenses $ ]
[other past economic loss $ ]
[a. Total Past Economic Damages: $ ]
[b. Future economic loss
[lost earnings $ ]
[lost profits $ ]
[medical expenses $ ]
[other future economic loss $ ]
[b. Total Future Economic Damages: $ ]
[c. Past noneconomic loss, including [physical
pain/mental suffering:] $ ]
[d. Future noneconomic loss, including [physical
pain/mental suffering:] $ ]
[d. TOTAL $
Signed: Presiding Juror
Dated:
After [this verdict form has/all verdict forms have] been signed, notify
the [clerk/bailiff/court attendant] that you are ready to present your
verdict in the courtroom.
New September 2003; Revised April 2007, December 2010, December 2016
Directions for Use
This verdict form is based on CACI No. 1405, False Arrest With Warrant - Essential
Factual Elements, and CACI No. 1406, False Arrest With Warrant - Peace
Offıcer - Affırmative Defense - “Good-Faith” Exception.
The special verdict forms in this section are intended only as models. They may
VF-1406 FALSE IMPRISONMENT
916
need to be modified depending on the facts of the case.
If the jury returns a verdict of no harm, the plaintiff is still entitled to an award of
nominal damages, such as one dollar. If nominal damages are being sought, modify
the directions after question 6 to direct the jury to skip question 7 and answer
question 8 if they find no harm. Then add a new question 8: “What amount of
nominal damages do you award [name of plaintiff]?” If this is done, add a direction
after question 7 that the jury should not answer question 8. Please note that the
committee has found no cases requiring the jury to determine the amount of
nominal damages.
If specificity is not required, users do not have to itemize all the damages listed in
question 7 and do not have to categorize “economic” and “noneconomic” damages,
especially if it is not a Proposition 51 case. The breakdown of damages is optional
depending on the circumstances.
If there are multiple causes of action, users may wish to combine the individual
forms into one form. If different damages are recoverable on different causes of
action, replace the damages tables in all of the verdict forms with CACI No. VF-
3920, Damages on Multiple Legal Theories.
If the jury is being given the discretion under Civil Code section 3288 to award
prejudgment interest (see Bullis v. Security Pac. Nat’l Bank (1978) 21 Cal.3d 801,
814 [148 Cal.Rptr. 22, 582 P.2d 109]), give CACI No. 3935, Prejudgment Interest.
This verdict form may need to be augmented for the jury to make any factual
findings that are required in order to calculate the amount of prejudgment interest.
FALSE IMPRISONMENT VF-1406
917
© Judicial Council of California.
