CALCRIM No. 2182. Evading Peace Officer: Misdemeanor (Veh. Code, § 2800.1(a))
Judicial Council of California Criminal Jury Instructions (2020 edition)Download PDF
2182.Evading Peace Officer: Misdemeanor (Veh. Code,
The defendant is charged [in Count ] with evading a peace officer
[in violation of Vehicle Code section 2800.1(a)].
To prove that the defendant is guilty of this crime, the People must
1. A peace officer driving a motor vehicle was pursuing the
2. The defendant, who was also driving a motor vehicle, willfully
fled from, or tried to elude, the officer, intending to evade the
3. All of the following were true:
(a) There was at least one lighted red lamp visible from the front
of the peace officer’s vehicle;
(b) The defendant either saw or reasonably should have seen the
(c) The peace officer’s vehicle was sounding a siren as reasonably
(d) The peace officer’s vehicle was distinctively marked;
(e) The peace officer was wearing a distinctive uniform.
[A person employed as a police officer by <insert name of
agency that employs police offıcer> is a peace officer.]
[A person employed by <insert name of agency that employs
peace offıcer, e.g., “the Department of Fish and Wildlife”> is a peace officer
if <insert description of facts necessary to make employee a
peace offıcer, e.g., “designated by the director of the agency as a peace
Someone commits an act willfully when he or she does it willingly or on
purpose. It is not required that he or she intend to break the law, hurt
someone else, or gain any advantage.
A vehicle is distinctively marked if it has features that are reasonably
noticeable to other drivers, including a red lamp, siren, and at least one
other feature that makes it look different from vehicles that are not used
for law enforcement purposes.
Adistinctive uniform means clothing adopted by a law enforcement
agency to identify or distinguish members of its force. The uniform does
not have to be complete or of any particular level of formality. However,
a badge, without more, is not enough.
New January 2006; Revised August 2006
The court has a sua sponte duty to give this instruction defining the elements of the
The jury must determine whether a peace officer was pursuing the defendant.
(People v. Flood (1998) 18 Cal.4th 470, 482 [76 Cal.Rptr.2d 180, 957 P.2d 869].)
The court must instruct the jury in the appropriate definition of “peace officer” from
the statute. (Ibid.) It is an error for the court to instruct that the witness is a peace
officer as a matter of law. (Ibid. [instruction that “Officer Bridgeman and Officer
Gurney are peace officers” was error].) If the witness is a police officer, give the
bracketed sentence that begins with “A person employed as a police officer.” If the
witness is another type of peace officer, give the bracketed sentence that begins with
“A person employed by.”
On request, the court must give CALCRIM No. 3426, Voluntary Intoxication, if
there is sufficient evidence of voluntary intoxication to negate the intent to evade.
(People v. Finney (1980) 110 Cal.App.3d 705, 712 [168 Cal.Rptr. 80].)
On request, give CALCRIM No. 2241, Driver and Driving Defined.
• Elements. Veh. Code, § 2800.1(a).
• Distinctively Marked Vehicle. People v. Hudson (2006) 38 Cal.4th 1002,
1010-1011 [44 Cal.Rptr.3d 632, 136 P.3d 168].
• Distinctive Uniform. People v. Estrella (1995) 31 Cal.App.4th 716, 724 [37
Cal.Rptr.2d 383]; People v. Mathews (1998) 64 Cal.App.4th 485, 491 [75
• Jury Must Determine If Peace Officers. People v. Flood (1998) 18 Cal.4th 470,
482 [76 Cal.Rptr.2d 180, 957 P.2d 869].
• Red Lamp, Siren, Additional Distinctive Feature of Car, and Distinctive Uniform
Must Be Proved. People v. Hudson (2006) 38 Cal.4th 1002, 1013 [44
Cal.Rptr.3d 632, 136 P.3d 168]; People v. Acevedo (2003) 105 Cal.App.4th 195,
199 [129 Cal.Rptr.2d 270]; People v. Brown (1989) 216 Cal.App.3d 596,
599-600 [264 Cal.Rptr. 908].
CALCRIM No. 2182 VEHICLE OFFENSES
Multiple Pursuing Officers Constitutes Only One Offense
A defendant “may only be convicted of one count of section 2800.2 even though the
pursuit involved multiple police officers in multiple police vehicles.” (People v.
Garcia (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 1159, 1163 [132 Cal.Rptr.2d 694].)
2 Witkin & Epstein, California Criminal Law (4th ed. 2012) Crimes Against Public
Peace and Welfare, § 328, 329.
3 Millman, Sevilla & Tarlow, California Criminal Defense Practice, Ch. 63, Double
Jeopardy, § 63.21[a] (Matthew Bender).
5 Millman, Sevilla & Tarlow, California Criminal Defense Practice, Ch. 91,
Sentencing, § 91.22[a][iv] (Matthew Bender).
2183-2199. Reserved for Future Use
VEHICLE OFFENSES CALCRIM No. 2182