Products Liability

A product liability lawsuit refers to a lawsuit brought by a consumer against anyone in the chain of manufacturing, including the manufacturer of any component parts, the manufacturer that assembles a complete item, and sometimes the retail storeowner. These lawsuits often concern the following:

Products with defects causing harm to the consumer or a person to whom the product was given are the subjects of these lawsuits. Usually the subject property is tangible property, such as cars, motorcycles, children's toys, household equipment, and tools. Product liability suits can also revolve around defective recreational vehicles and roller coasters. Whenever a product has a defect or is unreasonably dangerous and causes injury, it may be appropriate for the injured person to file a product liability lawsuit.

Types of Product Defects

There are three types of defects that can give rise to a product liability lawsuit: design defects, manufacturing defects, and marketing defects, which are better known as failures to warn. Manufacturing defects tend to be the most straightforward of the three types of claims.

A manufacturing defect occurs because of a flaw in construction or production. This type of defect occurs in only one or a few products of a particular type, rather than an entire line. The product that causes injury is different from the other ones. For example, a single motorcycle missing brake pads because the assembler of the motorcycle left them off would have a manufacturing defect. Similarly, a single bottle of medicine that has been mixed improperly such that is poisonous has a manufacturing defect. In order to recover when there is a manufacturing defect, the manufacturing defect must be the actual and proximate cause of an injury.

Unlike manufacturing defects, design defects are inherent to an entire line of the same product. Generally, every product of a particular type will be unreasonably dangerous to use, or otherwise defective, if there is a design defect, even though the product was made precisely according to the designer’s and manufacturer's specifications. For example, an SUV that has a tendency to roll over when taking a tight turn might have a design defect. Similarly, a toy that releases toxic fumes when used correctly would be defectively designed. In order to recover for a design defect, the design flaw rather than the plaintiff's negligent actions must have caused the plaintiff's injury.

Marketing defects concern inadequate instructions in how to use the product or a failure to warn of the product's latent dangers. Typically, a failure to warn lawsuit revolves around a product that is dangerous in a non-obvious way or that requires a consumer to take certain safety measures when using it. For example, a medication that should not be mixed with another commonly used medication can be the subject of a failure to warn lawsuit if a consumer mixes the two and is injured. Similarly, a new consumer tool that emits microscopic poisonous particles during use could be the subject of a failure to warn suit if the particles fly into a consumer's face, causing injury.

Product liability suits can be brought on the basis of negligence, strict liability, misrepresentation, or breach of warranty. In many states they are brought pursuant to a state statute.

Strict liability suits are based on the responsibility of the manufacturer to sell products fit for use, and they can be brought even when the manufacturer used reasonable care. The injured plaintiff need only prove that a particular product was defective and that the defect was the proximate cause of his or her injury. Usually, both sides must retain experts to offer opinions about whether the product was defective.

A negligence theory is appropriate when the manufacturer failed to exercise reasonable care. It is often raised in design defect cases when a manufacturer fails to account for a probable use of a particular product and the risk of harm that will result.

The law assumes that manufacturers give certain warranties, some implied and some express, that the goods they make, sell, and distribute are of a certain quality and fit for use. When a product causes harm, it may breach an implied or express warranty. For example, if marketing information promises that a jacket is bulletproof, and it is worn by a police officer who is shot, and it turns out that the jacket was not bulletproof, this may give rise to a failure to warn suit.

Misrepresentation applies when the advertising or promotion of a product gives consumers a false sense of security about using it. Misrepresentation can be intentional or negligent.

Featured CasesFeed



  • Proposed Rule - 911 Grant Program September 21, 2017 This action proposes revised implementing regulations for the 911 Grant Program, as a result of the enactment of the Next Generation 911 (NG911) Advancement Act of 2012. The 911 Grant Program provides grants to improve 911 services, E-911 services,…
  • Rule - Safety Standard for Infant Bouncer Seats September 18, 2017 The Danny Keysar Child Product Safety Notification Act, section 104 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA), requires the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (Commission or CPSC) to promulgate consumer product…
  • Rule - Protection of Human Subjects September 18, 2017 On January 19, 2017, the Federal departments and agencies that are subject to the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (referred to as the Common Rule) published a final rule amending the Common Rule. The Consumer Product Safety…
  • Notice - Sunshine Act Meeting September 7, 2017
  • Notice - International Standard-Setting Activities September 6, 2017 This notice informs the public of the sanitary and phytosanitary standard-setting activities of the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), in accordance with section 491 of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended, and the Uruguay Round…