Justia
search
My Account
Log In Sign Up
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Research the Law
  • Law Schools
  • Laws & Regs
  • Newsletters
  • Legal Marketing
    • Law Firm Websites
    • Law Firm SEO
    • Lawyer Directory
    • Local Marketing
    • PPC & LSA Management
    • Justia Onward
    • Other Marketing Solutions
Justia Lawyers and the Legal Process California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI) (2020) Vicarious Responsibility

Vicarious Responsibility

Series 3700 - Vicarious Responsibility

  • 3700. Introduction to Vicarious Responsibility
  • 3701. Tort Liability Asserted Against Principal - Essential Factual Elements
  • 3702. Affirmative Defense - Comparative Fault of Plaintiff’s Agent
  • 3703. Legal Relationship Not Disputed
  • 3704. Existence of “Employee” Status Disputed
  • 3705. Existence of “Agency” Relationship Disputed
  • 3706. Special Employment - Lending Employer Denies Responsibility for Worker’s Acts
  • 3707. Special Employment - Joint Responsibility
  • 3708. Peculiar-Risk Doctrine
  • 3709. Ostensible Agent
  • 3710. Ratification
  • 3711. Partnerships
  • 3712. Joint Ventures
  • 3713. Nondelegable Duty
  • 3714-3719. Reserved for Future Use
  • 3720. Scope of Employment
  • 3721. Scope of Employment - Peace Officer’s Misuse of Authority
  • 3722. Scope of Employment - Unauthorized Acts
  • 3723. Substantial Deviation
  • 3724. Social or Recreational Activities
  • 3725. Going-and-Coming Rule - Vehicle-Use Exception
  • 3726. Going-and-Coming Rule - Business-Errand Exception
  • 3727. Going-and-Coming Rule - Compensated Travel Time Exception
  • 3728-3799. Reserved for Future Use
  • VF-3700. Negligence - Vicarious Liability
  • VF-3701-VF-3799. Reserved for Future Use

© Judicial Council of California.

Page last updated October 2020

Today on Verdict

Why the Supreme Court was Right Last Week to Deny Review of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Decisions Handed Down Prior to the 2020 Election

Vikram David Amar Jason Mazzone

Illinois Law dean Vikram David Amar and professor Jason Mazzone argue that the U.S. Supreme Court correctly denied review last week of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decisions handed down before the 2020 election.

Find a Lawyer

Lawyers - Get Listed Now! Get a free directory profile listing

Ask a Lawyer

Question:
Add details
120
More Information:
1000
Justia Legal Resources
Find a Lawyer Arrow
  • Bankruptcy Lawyers
  • Business Lawyers
  • Criminal Lawyers
  • Employment Lawyers
  • Estate Planning Lawyers
  • Family Lawyers
  • Personal Injury Lawyers
  • More...
Individuals Arrow
  • Bankruptcy
  • Criminal
  • Divorce
  • DUI
  • Estate Planning
  • Family Law
  • Personal Injury
  • More...
Business Arrow
  • Business Formation
  • Business Operations
  • Employment
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Trade
  • Real Estate
  • Tax Law
  • More...
Law Students Arrow
  • Law Schools
  • Admissions
  • Financial Aid
  • Course Outlines
  • Law Journals
  • Blogs
  • Employment
  • More...
US Federal Law Arrow
  • US Constitution
  • US Code
  • Regulations
  • Supreme Court
  • Circuit Courts
  • District Courts
  • Dockets & Filings
  • More...
US State Law Arrow
  • State Constitutions
  • State Codes
  • State Case Law
  • California
  • Florida
  • New York
  • Texas
  • More...
Other Databases Arrow
  • COVID-19 Resources
  • Legal Blogs
  • Business Forms
  • Product Recalls
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Countries
  • More...
Legal Marketing Arrow
  • Law Firm Websites
  • Lawyer Blogs
  • Content
  • Social Media
  • Local Marketing
  • Paid Ads (CPC/PPC)
  • Lawyer Directory
  • More...
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Justia © 2021 Justia Legal Portal Company Help Terms of Service Privacy Policy Marketing Solutions