Justia
search
My Account
Log In Sign Up
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Research the Law
  • Law Schools
  • Laws & Regs
  • Newsletters
  • Marketing Solutions
    • Justia Connect
    • Pro Membership
    • Practice Membership
    • Public Membership
    • Justia Lawyer Directory
    • Platinum Placements
    • Gold Placements
    • Justia Elevate
    • SEO
    • Websites
    • Blogs
    • Justia Amplify
    • PPC Management
    • Google Business Profile
    • Social Media
    • Justia Onward Blog
Justia Lawyers and the Legal Process Center California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI) (2026) Evidence

Evidence

Series 200 - Evidence

  • 200. Obligation to Prove - More Likely True Than Not True
  • 201. Highly Probable - Clear and Convincing Proof
  • 202. Direct and Indirect Evidence
  • 203. Party Having Power to Produce Better Evidence
  • 204. Willful Suppression of Evidence
  • 205. Failure to Explain or Deny Evidence
  • 206. Evidence Admitted for Limited Purpose
  • 207. Evidence Applicable to One Party
  • 208. Deposition as Substantive Evidence
  • 209. Use of Interrogatories of a Party
  • 210. Requests for Admissions
  • 211. Prior Conviction of a Felony
  • 212. Statements of a Party Opponent
  • 213. Adoptive Admissions
  • 214. Reserved for Future Use
  • 215. Exercise of a Communication Privilege
  • 216. Exercise of Right Not to Incriminate Oneself (Evid. Code, § 913)
  • 217. Evidence of Settlement
  • 218. Statements Made to Physician (Previously Existing Condition)
  • 219. Expert Witness Testimony
  • 220. Experts - Questions Containing Assumed Facts
  • 221. Conflicting Expert Testimony
  • 222. Evidence of Sliding-Scale Settlement
  • 223. Opinion Testimony of Lay Witness
  • 224. Testimony of Child
  • 225-299. Reserved for Future Use

© Judicial Council of California.

Page last reviewed April 2026

Today on Verdict

The Supreme Court Gives the Spending Clause a Haircut

Michael C. Dorf

Cornell Law professor Michael C. Dorf examines the Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling in Landor v. Louisiana, which held that individual prison officials cannot be sued for damages under RLUIPA even after knowingly violating a Rastafarian prisoner’s religious freedom rights.

Find a Lawyer

Lawyers - Get Listed Now! Get a free directory profile listing

Ask a Lawyer
Get Free Answers

Have a legal question? Get free answers from experienced lawyers!

Justia Legal Resources
Find a Lawyer Arrow
  • Bankruptcy Lawyers
  • Business Lawyers
  • Criminal Lawyers
  • Employment Lawyers
  • Estate Planning Lawyers
  • Family Lawyers
  • Personal Injury Lawyers
  • More...
Individuals Arrow
  • Bankruptcy
  • Criminal
  • Divorce
  • DUI
  • Estate Planning
  • Family Law
  • Personal Injury
  • More...
Business Arrow
  • Business Formation
  • Business Operations
  • Employment
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Trade
  • Real Estate
  • Tax Law
  • More...
Law Schools Arrow
  • Dictionary
  • Admissions
  • Financial Aid
  • Course Outlines
  • Law Journals
  • Blogs
  • Employment
  • More...
U.S. Federal Law Arrow
  • U.S. Constitution
  • U.S. Code
  • Regulations
  • Supreme Court
  • Circuit Courts
  • District Courts
  • Dockets & Filings
  • More...
U.S. State Law Arrow
  • State Constitutions
  • State Codes
  • State Case Law
  • California
  • Florida
  • New York
  • Texas
  • More...
Other Databases Arrow
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Blogs
  • Business Forms
  • Product Recalls
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Countries
  • More...
Marketing Solutions Arrow
  • Justia Connect Membership
  • Justia Lawyer Directory
  • Justia Premium Placements
  • Justia Elevate (SEO, Websites)
  • Justia Amplify (PPC, GBP)
  • Justia Onward Blog
  • Testimonials
  • More...
LinkedIn YouTube Facebook Instagram Threads Bluesky X Justia © 2026 Justia Justia Connect Legal Portal Company Help Terms of Service Privacy Policy Marketing Solutions