Federal Employers’ Liability Act

Series 2900 - Federal Employers’ Liability Act

2900. FELA - Essential Factual Elements
2901. Negligence - Duty of Railroad
2902. Negligence - Assignment of Employees
2903. Causation - Negligence
2904. Comparative Fault
2905. Compliance With Employer’s Requests or Directions
2906-2919. Reserved for Future Use
2920. Federal Safety Appliance Act or Boiler Inspection Act - Essential Factual Elements
2921. Causation Under FSAA or BIA
2922. Statute of Limitations - Special Verdict Form or Interrogatory
2923. Borrowed Servant/Dual Employee
2924. Status as Defendant’s Employee - Subservant Company
2925. Status of Defendant as Common Carrier
2926. Scope of Employment
2927-2939. Reserved for Future Use
2940. Income Tax Effects of Award
2941. Introduction to Damages for Personal Injury
2942. Damages for Death of Employee
2943-2999. Reserved for Future Use
VF-2900. FELA - Negligence - Plaintiff’s Negligence at Issue
VF-2901. Federal Safety Appliance Act or Boiler Inspection Act
VF-2902-VF-2999. Reserved for Future Use

© Judicial Council of California.

Page last reviewed May 2022

Today on Verdict

What Does it Mean for Other Institutions to “Defy” or “Check” the Supreme Court? Not What the Court Invites Those Institutions to Do

Illinois Law dean Vikram David Amar and professor Jason Mazzone respond to a recent column by New York Times columnist David Leonhardt, arguing that neither of the recent high-profile developments after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision is an example of “defying” the Court or “checking” judicial power.