Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Series 4100 - Breach of Fiduciary Duty

4100. “Fiduciary Duty” Explained
4101. Failure to Use Reasonable Care - Essential Factual Elements
4102. Duty of Undivided Loyalty - Essential Factual Elements
4103. Duty of Confidentiality - Essential Factual Elements
4104. Duties of Escrow Holder
4105. Duties of Stockbroker - Speculative Securities
4106. Breach of Fiduciary Duty by Attorney - Essential Factual Elements
4107. Duty of Disclosure by Real Estate Broker to Client
4108. Failure of Seller’s Real Estate Broker to Conduct Reasonable Inspection - Essential Factual Elements (Civ. Code, § 2079)
4109. Duty of Disclosure by Seller’s Real Estate Broker to Buyer
4110. Breach of Duty by Real Estate Seller’s Agent - Inaccurate Information in Multiple Listing Service - Essential Factual Elements (Civ. Code, § 1088)
4111. Constructive Fraud (Civ. Code, § 1573)
4112-4119. Reserved for Future Use
4120. Affirmative Defense - Statute of Limitations
4121-4199. Reserved for Future Use

© Judicial Council of California.

Page last reviewed May 2022

Today on Verdict

What Does it Mean for Other Institutions to “Defy” or “Check” the Supreme Court? Not Quite What the Court Invites Those Institutions to Do

Illinois Law dean Vikram David Amar and professor Jason Mazzone respond to a recent column by New York Times columnist David Leonhardt, arguing that neither of the recent high-profile developments after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision is an example of “defying” the Court or “checking” judicial power.